AI makes building easy. Good judgement decides what succeeds.
Every post here is one real builder, taken from the real world, and run through the same check. An abdication of human judgement in any one of three registers risks a total failure the AI will never pay a price for.
Origination of What Should Be Built
Was the work started for a reason — the work that should be done, not merely could be?
Observation While It's Being Built
Was anyone watching while the AI carried it out — reading what shipped, not just that it shipped?
Answerability for What Shipped
Did a human remain capable of answering for the work on the other side?
Find yourself
Six situations. One check.
Each situation has its post: the best one I have found so far, the person and company changed, read against the same three questions every time. The situation label opens the situation itself.
An analyst at a shipping company built the tool the official systems never gave the team. It was public to the whole internet, and the company found out from a reporter.
A removals company replaced six subscriptions with one platform mostly written by AI, and it runs the business now. The question is who answers for it in three years.
A national benefits agency runs on decades of COBOL, and a plan surfaced to translate all of it in months with AI. Nothing has broken yet, which is the question.
A very large retailer's engineering teams had four high-severity incidents in one week, one with checkout down for six hours. The memo that followed named AI-assisted changes.